The kids and I got to see the latest incarnation of the ubiquitous boy wizard this past weekend courtesy of one of the drug companies that was trying to convince Mom McMains that theirs was the best antibiotic ever. The movie version of Harry Potter was quite ambitious, clocking in at two and a half hours — quite a stretch for the children at whom it’s aimed. Director Chris Columbus did a good job with the film version, remaining very true to the source material, and creating a lovely and believable version of Rowling’s story.
At the risk of sounding like a boring Luddite, the thing that I found most unsatisfying about the film was that the richness of the world was (perhaps unavoidably) sacrificed. Though two and a half hours is a long film, it’s still a dreadfully short time to fully savor the fiction upon which Ms. Rowling has evidently lavished such thought and care. As with Tolkien, her characters inhabit a deeply textured universe. She leaves various mysteries dangling from one book to another to help create a more fully melded tapestry of the whole multiple-book story arc — a luxury we’re not allowed in the film version. But given the constraints the medium inevitably puts upon the story, Potter fans should find this a satisfying addition to the merchandising avalanche.